Bet Slip
My Bet Slip
-
How to use My Betslip
Placing a Single Bet Placing a Multiple Bet Manage bookmakers

Simply click a price on Race Passes and we’ll take you off to place your bet with your favourite bookmaker. You can also place single bets from the Bet Slip – just click the price in the Bet Slip.

Our Bet Slip allows you to build up your selections before you begin placing multiple bets with your favourite bookmakers. Click the +BET button to add your selections and then, when you’re ready, hit ‘Bet Now’ to go to your chosen bookmaker’s site and place your bets.

Select the bookmaker prices you want to display on Race Passes by switching the toggles between show and hide in the Bookmaker Manager, or use the Currently Showing selection screen. We will automatically display the best odds from your chosen bookmakers.

Note that Betfair Exchange prices are available to logged in customers only and are not included in the best odds calculation.

Bets Odds
You currently have no selections.
timeform logo mini sign in to timeformSign In

register to timeformRegister Free Bets
timeform menu collapse

The Timeform Knowledge: Measuring Trends and Effects

ArticleImage

The latest edition of The Timeform Knowledge explains the importance of measuring trends and effect in horse racing analysis.

We live in the era of Big Data – of massive databases that can be interrogated with complex statistical tools to produce all manner of insights – but let’s also hear it for the little guy. Big Data may be all the rage more widely, but Little Data remains highly important in the realms of horse racing analysis.

By its nature, much of what matters in horse racing is individualised and dynamic, transitory even. It is, in other words, on the small side in terms of sample sizes and timescales.  

It is in the nature of betting on horse racing, and of betting on many uncertain outcomes, that you need to act upon incomplete information. It is also in the nature of betting on horse racing that the precedents you use to inform your decisions may well change over time.

In few places is this more apparent than in the field of so-called “trends”.

The theory behind trends is that outcomes in horse racing tend to be repeated across time. There is something in this, but there is also a clear danger of simplifying a complex problem primarily for convenience.

Trends tend to look at individual races, and of what it has taken to win, or run well in, that race previously. Actually, it would be a lot better if they did seek to establish more often what it took to “run well” in a race: more usually, they obsess with winners.

The flaw in this should be obvious to the more astute reader. Winners are just one extreme of a wide spectrum of performance, from winning like a champion to losing like a bum. By turning performance into a binary “did it win, or did it not?”, a huge amount of important information will be lost.

This is exacerbated by the fact that, if you are looking at one race, over a period of time, there can only ever be one winner each year, and your sample size will be puny unless you extend the search back many years (which will likely make it no longer relevant).

One solution is to use measures which are more nuanced than “winners only”. The more sophisticated the measure, the smaller (and therefore the more current) the sample can be while it remains possible to draw reasonable conclusions.

If not “winners only”, then how about placed horses? How about winners and placed horses being compared to how many winners and placed horses could be expected by chance (known as “impact values”)?

How about lengths beaten, or Timeform rating run to, or the proportion of rivals beaten? All of these have validity (and all of them have drawbacks or complications!), and are an improvement on the binary world of “win or not?”

One consequence of an increasingly nuanced way of looking at the information available is that effects which seemed to exist when looked at crudely (such as through wins only) often lessen or disappear. The corollary to that is that if an effect persists it is far more likely to have substance.

It is worth looking at an example in detail: age-related data and the Old Borough Handicap, due to be run at Haydock on 5 September. All runnings of the race from 2005 to 2014 were considered, with the 2008 contest not taking place.

Age Related Data in the Old Borough Handicap
 3yo4yo5yo+
3 3 3

In the first instance, we can simply consider the number of wins achieved by each age-group (Row 1). There seems to be no effect: each of the age-groups has won three races. Believe it or not, some people – including those who really should know better – look no further than this.

If nothing else, we should really consider opportunity, starting with the number of horses to have run from each age-group (Row 2). In terms of complexity and an evolution in analysis, this simple step is akin to life emerging from the primordial swamp. It can be seen that three-year-olds had far fewer opportunities to gain their three wins than the other age-groups.

But we can do better. Achievement compared to opportunity can be expressed as a strike-rate (Row 3): that is, the % of horses from that age-group which won. Things are looking better still for three-year-olds, but what if that age-group had only ever contested small-field runnings of the race?

Row 4 establishes the number of wins each age-group should have achieved by random (the sum of 1/(number of runners) for all cases in each category, so field size is taken into account) and then an impact value, which is wins achieved divided by wins expected at random.

But we have still considered winners and winners only. If we want to do better still – the evolutionary equivalent of walking on our hind legs or discovering fire – then we need to consider beaten horses also. If an effect exists, then it should apply across the board, and not just conveniently to those horses which win.

Age Related Data in the Old Borough Handicap (first 4 finishers)
 3yo4yo5yo+
7 15 14

The message is similar, but the measures can be relied upon more. Three-year-olds have actually provided fewer first-four finishers than the other two age-groups, but those seven have come from just a dozen runners. This translates into a superior strike-rate, impact value and % of rivals beaten.

That measure of % of rivals beaten takes things one step further than any measure based on first-four places by considering exactly where in the field a horse finished and the % of its rivals that finished behind it. “Par” will be 50%, and a figure of 68.8% is very high indeed.

There are drawbacks to % rivals beaten as a measure – principally that information further down the field gets accorded undue significance – but things tend to come out in the wash, even in fairly small sample sizes, and the 50% par is clear and intuitive.

The message is simple: offset the smallness of sample sizes inescapably associated with trends by using measures more sophisticated than winners only (and the more sophisticated those measures the better).

And it is simple in another respect: three-year-olds have done notably well in recent Old Borough Cups, even if wins alone disguise that fact!  

TIMEFORM RACE CARD PDF DOWNLOADS

Horse racing free bet offers

  • Money back as cash up to £20 if your first bet loses

    Max £20 refund on first bet. Bet must be placed in first 7 days of account opening. Only deposits made via Debit Card will be eligible for the promotion. T&Cs apply.

    Read Betfair Review
  • Sign up and bet £20 - Get your money back as cash if it loses

    New customers only. Place your FIRST bet on any Horse Racing market and if it loses we will refund your stake in CASH. Max refund for this offer is £20. Only deposits made using cards will qualify for this promotion. T&Cs apply.

    Read Paddy Power Review
  • Bet 10 Get £/€40 + 10 on Casino

    New customers only • Min deposit £10 • A qualifying bet is a ‘real money’ stake of at least £10 • Min odds 1/2 (1.5) • Free Bets credited upon qualifying bet settlement and expires after 7 days • Free Bet stakes not included in returns • Deposit balance is available for withdrawal at any time • Withdrawal restrictions & full T&Cs apply

    Read 888sport Review

Free Daily Race Pass

LATEST HORSE RACING RESULTS

17:30 KILLARNEY

1st G. B. Noonan silk 4. LIPA K (IRE) 5/16
2nd Mr P. W. Mullins silk ½ 2. FELIX SUMMUS (IRE) 6/42.5f
3rd Mr J. J. Codd silk ½ 9. THEMANINTHEBOOTS (IRE) 5/23.5
J: G. B. Noonan (7)  
All 11 ran.
FULL RESULT

17:15 NAAS

1st C. T. Keane silk 4. HALE BOPP (IRE) 4/15
2nd J. Coen silk 1. LONGBOURN (IRE) 12/113
3rd Declan McDonogh silk 11. COINS CROSS (IRE) 6/17
J: C. T. Keane  
13 ran. NRs: 12  6 
FULL RESULT

17:10 RIPON

1st Sam James silk 5. MISS BRITAIN (IRE) 3/14f
2nd Faye McManoman silk 4. WOODLANDS CHARM (IRE) 16/117
3rd David Allan silk hd 6. PRAYER MATT 7/24.5
J: Sam James  
T: Gemma Tutty  
All 14 ran.
FULL RESULT

17:00 KILLARNEY

1st S. Fitzgerald silk 8. STEALTHY TOM (IRE) 5/42.25f
2nd Phillip Enright silk 10. PRESENTING CODY (IRE) 12/113
3rd L. P. Dempsey silk 12 7. SHES SOME DOLL (IRE) 8/19
J: S. Fitzgerald (5)  
15 ran. NRs: 16  17  18 
FULL RESULT

16:52 STRATFORD-ON-AVON

1st Kevin Jones silk 2. COPSHILL LAD (IRE) 4/51.8f
2nd Sam Twiston-Davies silk 6. THE KNIPHAND (FR) 11/43.75
J: Kevin Jones  
All 7 ran.
FULL RESULT

16:45 NAAS

1st S. M. Crosse silk 3. AMORTENTIA (IRE) 5/23.5f
2nd Shane Foley silk ½ 4. COWBOY JUSTICE 9/110
3rd R. Whearty silk 8. EASTERN WIND 8/19
J: S. M. Crosse  
All 10 ran.
FULL RESULT

16:40 RIPON

1st Daniel Tudhope silk 4. HOLOCENE 4/51.8f
2nd Joe Fanning silk 7. YORKINDNESS 4/15
5 ran. NRs: 2  5 
FULL RESULT

16:30 KILLARNEY

1st J. W. Kennedy silk 9. SAY GOODBYE (IRE) 3/14jf
2nd Jack G. Gilligan silk 10 3. EFFERNOCK FIZZ (IRE) 6/17
3rd M. P. Walsh silk ½ 7. NORWIGI (IRE) 3/14jf
8 ran. NRs: 8 
FULL RESULT

16:22 STRATFORD-ON-AVON

1st Philip Armson silk 3. VERNON SUBUTEX (FR) 7/24.5
2nd Sam Twiston-Davies silk 5. HELFORD RIVER 3/14
J: Philip Armson (5)  
T: David Pipe  
All 5 ran.
FULL RESULT
Go to Horse Racing Results