Bet Slip
My Bet Slip
How to use My Betslip
Placing a Single Bet Placing a Multiple Bet Manage bookmakers

Simply click a price on Race Passes and we’ll take you off to place your bet with your favourite bookmaker. You can also place single bets from the Bet Slip – just click the price in the Bet Slip.

Our Bet Slip allows you to build up your selections before you begin placing multiple bets with your favourite bookmakers. Click the +BET button to add your selections and then, when you’re ready, hit ‘Bet Now’ to go to your chosen bookmaker’s site and place your bets.

Select the bookmaker prices you want to display on Race Passes by switching the toggles between show and hide in the Bookmaker Manager, or use the Currently Showing selection screen. We will automatically display the best odds from your chosen bookmakers.

Note that Betfair Exchange prices are available to logged in customers only and are not included in the best odds calculation.

Bets Odds
You currently have no selections.
timeform logo mini sign in to timeformSign In

register to timeformRegister Free Bets
timeform menu collapse
search timeform's website

How ratings can help to evaluate “The Best Horse In The World”


After recent debate over the best racehorse in the world, Simon Rowlands looks at alternative ways of reaching a definitive answer.

The recent publication of an update to the Longines-sponsored World’s Best Racehorse Rankings (WBBRs) quite put the cat among the pigeons, with many racing fans aghast that Arrogate had retained his number-one position despite a third-successive defeat a few days earlier at the Breeders’ Cup.

It does not help that many of the obvious alternatives – such as Winx, Gun Runner and Enable – are as consistent as Arrogate has proved to be inconsistent. That trio have won, respectively, six, four and six races, most of them at the top level, since Arrogate gained what proved to be his final win (from Gun Runner, as it happens), in the Dubai World Cup in March. 

There was a lot of heat but not a lot of light in the various commentary pieces on the situation, with few seeming to grasp that the WBRRs take into account form over the entire year and are guided by a horse’s best effort in that time. You cannot simply pretend that Dubai did not happen. 


(video courtesy of MeydanRacing)

There is some truth in the observation that the WBRRs should really be called the “World’s Best Racehorse Performance”, though that is presumably a more difficult concept to sell. It also conveniently ignores the fact that a horse’s best recent effort is a powerful predictor of future achievement more generally. 

There are alternatives to the attempt to define a racehorse by one peak effort, of course, and ratings systems might do well to give greater coverage to the array of performance ratings which go towards one over-arching master rating. A fuller picture allows the onlooker to weigh up matters of consistency, versatility and durability for themselves if they wish.

One alternative is to consider what would happen if a fictitious horserace were to take place, with each runner’s effort picked at random from its historical performance ratings over an agreed timescale. If you repeat the exercise often enough, you get a fair reflection of how often each horse “should” win based on the horses’ performance ratings (all of them, not just the peak ones).

The usual way of doing this is through what is known as a Monte Carlo Simulation, but it is feasible to cover all eventualities mathematically with a smaller sample.

First, you need to know what the horses’ array of performance ratings are. For this, I took the six most credible contenders for title of “Best Horse In The World” and extracted their Timeform assessments during 2017 for the first running of what may be called the Timeform Grand Prix.

For the purpose of this exercise, the two females – Winx and Enable – have 3 added to each of their performance ratings to reflect the fact that they would receive a sex allowance if meeting male rivals in the real world. Those performance ratings also include Timeform “value extra” uplifts for ease of victory.

If you run every possible permutation of the “race”, sampling from each horse’s array of performance ratings, you get in excess of 50,000 unique contests. A rating of at least 125 is needed to win in every case, for each fictitious contest will have a Gun Runner in it running to 125 or higher.

The highest ratings – Enable’s 137 in winning the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe at Chantilly and Winx’s 137 in winning the George Ryder at Rosehill – trump all others (besides when they meet each other and “dead heat”) but represent only 1/7 and 1/9 of those horses’ possible performances.

This is what the full simulation produces in terms of winning percentages across the 50,000+ races.

Each of the sextet could be expected to win at least 10% of the time, but it is Battaash who emerges victorious with a win-rate of 26.2%. That may come as a surprise!

Battaash ran only five times in 2017, but two of his wins (the King George at Goodwood and the Prix de l’Abbaye at Chantilly) were outstanding on Timeform figures. That is a larger proportion of performances at an elite level than the others.

Battaash’s other three performances won him none of the simulated races, but it is better to be hit or miss in such scenarios than to be worthily consistent: Gun Runner has more 130+ rated performances than any bar Winx, but they do not help him to many victories.

It might be argued that Enable’s first couple of performances (and Cracksman’s first) should be ignored, as she was not then the filly she later became. But it could also be argued that Arrogate’s and Battaash’s worst efforts should be excluded for being unrepresentative. In a review of a calendar year, all performances count.

Perhaps the enduring message is to recognise that an array of performance ratings gives a fuller picture of a horse’s achievements than one master rating alone, and reflects things like consistency and the number of times a certain level has been reached. But one master rating is needed, to determine weight carried in the real world, among other considerations.

Before finishing, it is worth commenting on those Battaash ratings, as he is the one top horse about which Timeform is in strong disagreement with the WBRRs (who has the horse on 123, the equivalent of 127 on Timeform’s longer-standing scale).

This comes down to the pounds-per-margin beaten in use by the respective ratings bodies as much as anything. It can be inferred from the BHA blog written after the Abbaye that just 18 lb per second was used (there was 0.95s between Battaash and fifth-placed Queen Kindly), which is an astonishingly small amount for a 5f race won in 57.59s.

Timeform used 26 lb per second, in line with its published methodology, which is sensitive to conditions and not fixed simply according to race distance. Esteemed author Bob Wilkins suggests this figure could be higher still.

The BHA’s “Guide To Handicapping” states an approximate pounds-per-length conversion of 3 lb per length at 5f, which is markedly out of line with most informed views on the matter. The discrepancy is significantly greater at distances short of a mile than at further.

There is empirical support for such an assertion, as those values do not more widely achieve the stated desire of equalising the chances of horses running in handicaps, in which last-time winners continue to win more often than last-time seconds, who continue to win more often than last-time thirds, and so on.

And those values most certainly undersell horses, like Battaash, who win top-class sprints by sizeable margins and in fast times, for it is almost impossible for them to win by far enough to get the sort of rating achieved by comparable horses at longer distances.

There is room for disagreement on exactly what Battaash should be rated, for sure, as there is on precisely how ratings define a horse’s ability more widely. But that he is a better horse than recognised officially appears as clear as day.


Horse racing free bet offers

  • BET £10 GET £30 FREE

    New customers only – Minimum deposit of £10 using deposit code 30f - A qualifying bet is a ‘real money’ stake of at least £10 placed on any sports market - Minimum odds of 1/2 (1.5) - Free bets credited upon qualifying bet settlement and expire after 7 days - Free bet stakes not included in returns - See site for Withdrawal restriction and full T&C’s apply

    Read 888sport Review

    Risk Free 20: New customers only, limited to one per person. If you’ve previously had a Paddy Power account, you will not qualify for the offer. Place your FIRST bet on any Sportsbook market and if it loses we will refund your stake in CASH. Max refund for this offer is €20. Only deposits made using Cards or Paypal will qualify for this promotion. T&Cs apply. Paddy's Rewards Club: Get a €10 free bet when you place 5x bets of €10+. T&Cs apply.

    Read Paddy Power Review

    New customers only, receive a free bet up to the value of your first qualifying bet. Minimum stake €5, minimum odds 1/5 (1.2). If your first bet is an accumulator, at least one selection must meet the min odds requirement. Qualifying bet must be placed in first 30 days of account opening. Offer is only available to customers who deposit using Debit/Credit or Paypal. Max free bet €50 – valid for 7 days. T&Cs apply.

    Read Betfair Review


race pass logo


Monday 28 May
1. AL ASEF 93
Daniel Muscutt silk Daniel Muscutt
Marco Botti
William Buick silk William Buick
Joseph Tuite
3. HOW FAR (IRE) 79
Jack Mitchell silk Jack Mitchell
Simon Crisford hot trainer
Go to Full Race



1st Donnacha O'Brien silk 8. LUCIUS TIBERIUS (IRE) 6/52.2f
2nd C. O'Donoghue silk 5. ESCAPABILITY (IRE) 4/15
3rd K. J. Manning silk ½ 4. DAWN TROUPER (IRE) 6/17
15 ran. NRs: 7 


1st Andrew Tinkler silk 6. WAIKIKI WAVES (FR) 5/16
2nd Andrew Glassonbury silk hd 5. NOW LISTEN HERE (IRE) 9/43.25f
3rd Brendan Powell silk 10 4. VEXILLUM (IRE) 7/18
T: Gary Moore  
9 ran. NRs: 10  3  9 

5:35 KELSO

1st Ryan Day silk 3. RUBYTWO 9/43.25f
2nd Ross Chapman silk nk 7. KEEP THE RIVER 5/23.5
3rd Callum Bewley silk 1 8. LADY BABS 33/134
J: Ryan Day (3)  
All 10 ran.


1st Daryl Jacob silk 2. NELSON'S TOUCH 7/24.5f
2nd Charlie Hammond silk ns 11. CATCHIN TIME (IRE) 9/110
3rd Tom O'Brien silk 3. LEAPAWAY (IRE) 9/25.5
J: Daryl Jacob  
All 11 ran.


1st R. P. Whelan silk 7. ST STEPHENS GREEN (IRE) 13/27.5
2nd K. J. Manning silk 1. CLONGOWES (IRE) 7/18
3rd W. M. Lordan silk ½ 9. GREAT TRANGO (IRE) 10/111
J: R. P. Whelan  
13 ran. NRs: 8 


1st Harry Cobden silk 1. NEVER LEARN (IRE) 11/43.75jf
2nd Thomas Cheesman silk 8. WHAT LARKS (IRE) 10/111
J: Harry Cobden  
7 ran. NRs: 5 

5:00 KELSO

1st Mr Noel George silk 2. KILBREE KID (IRE) 10/34.33
2nd Mr B. G. Crawford silk 1. DOUBLE WHAMMY 5/42.25f
3rd Miss Emma Todd silk 17 9. SHIMLA DAWN (IRE) 10/34.33
J: Mr Noel George (3)  
T: Tom George  
All 9 ran.


1st Edward Austin silk 8. MUHTARIS (IRE) 16/117
2nd Sean Bowen silk 3. BARTON KNOLL 11/26.5
3rd Daniel Sansom silk ¾ 4. BURST YA BUBBLE (IRE) 7/24.5f
J: Edward Austin (10)  
T: Ian Williams  
All 14 ran.


1st William Buick silk 3. SALTONSTALL 7/18
2nd T. M. Sherry silk 1 5. MASTER SPEAKER (IRE) 14/115
3rd Jamie Spencer silk 1. MASSIF CENTRAL (IRE) 7/18
13 ran. NRs: 14 
Go to Horse Racing Results